Sometimes, true dominance lies in silence — in the ability to access what is left unspoken. In every company, there is an archive employee sitting quietly in the shadows, witnessing secrets that even the CEO does not know. So, is this person just an ordinary employee, or a silent witness who knows everything happening behind the scenes?
In the following lines, employee development expert and compliance officer Rami Al-Jarzi explains the role played by the archive employee — the one who reads what is not written and knows what is not said. He answers the question: Is the archive employee just a simple administrator, or is he the company’s ever-watchful eye?
Because He Sees All the Documents That Departments Hide
When sensitive plans, memos, and correspondences are sent to the archive, they are not sent to oblivion, but to his watchful eyes. He is the first to examine files meant to be forgotten or hidden from ordinary employees. He sees decisions that were never executed, deals that fell through, objections that were written and then withdrawn before they became public. While these details are forgotten in upper offices, they remain vivid in his memory — which knows exactly where each file was placed and why.
How Does His Access to Documents Give Him More Knowledge Than the Manager?
The manager deals with summaries, but the archive employee reads full texts — with all their leaks, conflicts, and contradictions. The archive never forgets, even if management does. A document hidden from the screen remains printed and preserved by him. Over time, he discerns patterns: who hides what? Who decides silently? And who repeats the same mistakes as if unaware that they are documented?
Because He Is the Silent Witness to Employee Movements
Every hiring request, transfer, or resignation passes through his hands. He does not intervene, but he observes. He sees the timeline of people’s movements within the company, knows who approached centers of influence, who was suddenly marginalized without clear reasons, who is repeatedly reassigned, who was quietly removed by internal decisions, and who was transferred to ease tensions. He is not a spy, but he reads job trajectories like a novel, from the first chapter to the last.
Why Does This Knowledge Help Him Map the Hidden Power Structures Inside the Company?
Because he connects dates with decisions and people with outcomes. He understands when empowerment begins and when soft removals start. He notices recurring names and positions, who is silently promoted and who is excluded without explanation. He realizes who enjoys unofficial protection and who falls victim to hidden conflicts between departments.
Because He Sees Management’s Failures Before They Become Public
Not every failure of management is announced in meetings. Some defeats are buried in papers: a project canceled before being announced, a contract withdrawn at the last moment, an internal issue erased under the label “misunderstanding.” All these facts are preserved in files, which he reads as part of his job, not out of curiosity. When he silently smiles during the manager’s celebration of a new project launch, it is because he knows that plan was tried before — and silently failed.
How Do These Failures Give Him Knowledge That Even the Manager Lacks?
Because he holds the institutional memory, while the manager often only has the enthusiasm of beginnings. Failures are not announced, but they leave behind silent papers that tell everything. Repeated failure always starts from ignorance of previous attempts — and he sees them documented with dates and signatures.
Because He Holds the Company’s Paper Memory
In a world where everything is digital, paper remains an unalterable mirror. He keeps original copies of decisions that were modified, drafts of speeches never delivered, correspondences written but never sent. In moments of conflict or confusion, when narratives clash, he is the reference to which everyone returns — because what he holds cannot be altered or forgotten. His memory is not only in files but in his ability to recall the full context of any decision, from start to finish.
Why Does This Memory Become a Power That Sometimes Surpasses the Manager?
Because it gives him the ability to link past and present, rather than just focus on the current moment like the manager usually does. It also enables him to expose contradictions between words and actions through documents that no one else remembers. Moreover, it grants him unofficial authority during crises: when disputes escalate, the argument is not settled by the manager’s word, but by a paper he keeps in an old drawer.
Post a Comment